Letter to the editor: David Koresh and the Branch Davidians
June 14, 2019 § 3 Comments
Cleaning out a pile of papers, I found this letter I wrote to some editor in April 1993 about the massacre of the Branch Davidians led by David Koresh.
“Branch Davidians” evokes prophetic Hebrew scripture references to Israel’s King David as a Branch, which is also one of the possible readings of “Nazorean”, as in Jesus the Nazorean, which usually gets translated “of Nazareth”. The word Nazorean has no clear meaning; a third translation would be “Nairite”, referring to the vows taken by consecrated warriors in ancient Israel’s tribal period, of which Samson is the most famous—vows which Jesus seems to have taken at the Last Supper himself when he said he would not taste wine until the end; this is one of the terms of the vow.
“Koresh” is the Hebrew transliteration of Cyrus, the Persian king who freed the Israelites from Babylonian captivity, supported their return to Israel, and funded the rebuilding of the temple. He is the only gentile to be called a messiah in Hebrew scripture.
Religious apocalyptic communities rise up periodically in Christian history. It’s only a matter of time before another one challenges the state and its alleged monopoly on lethal force. It’s only a matter of time before the cataclysmic breakdown of ecosystems from global warming and the consequent breakdown of social systems encourages another group to imagine they live in the endtimes and now is their chance to play a minor but indispensable role in their apocalyptic unfolding.
Donald Trump’s assault on the FBI encourages us to defend the Bureau as the good guys these days, but their past sins are a reminder of what they are capable, and they are a police force; they believe in force. This letter reminds me not to forget.
Here’s the letter:
I wonder whether those who commanded and executed the siege of David Koresh’s followers felt a rage and contempt for his religious fanaticism that then became a blindness toward the possibility of less violent responses to the community’s actions? For instance, even my own knowledge of the apocalyptic scriptures and language that informed the community’s worldview suggests quite strongly that fire would be the inevitable outcome of a final, dedicated assault on their compound.
Did no one read the books of Revelation, Daniel, relevant passages of Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Zechariah, to seek some avenue to peaceful resolution, or at least the release of the innocents? Did the government consider bringing in someone who could offer alternative readings of Christian apocalyptic that do not involve serving in a violent war of judgment as a sacred warrior? Did anyone ever try to actually understand these people on their own terms?
Apparently the only terms held in common between the two armed camps were weapons, fear, and blood. As a Quaker, I am confident in the tradition that Jesus consistently and clearly renounced violence, both in his teachings and in his life example. Did anyone ask David Koresh how he made the jump from this example of messiahship to his own? Did anyone ask the ATF or the FBI, some of whom were, presumably, at least nominally Christian, how they made the leap from love they neighbor to teargassing children? Did anyone witness to either of them out of an authentic religious concern?
The incident asks us profound questions about the perversion of value in our society. I can’t stop thinking about the children, screaming and melting in untold agony. I think about the effects of watching that dreadful firestorm on our own children on television, thinking about their sisters and brothers in there, hardly different from themselves, except that they were burning to death, and that grownups can do this kind of thing. Or was it just another TV show?
Is nothing sacred? Or is only violence?
Through the Flaming Sword 
Yesterday I skimmed the intro of this post and passed on the letter … framing assumption seemed to be that in matters integral to religion, humanity is rational. Doesn’t such a belief approximate a form of doublespeak? The existence of the neurological adaptation of motivated reasoning among us self-aware critters suggests that rational thinking plays only a minor role in our social behavior. Functionally, don’t we feel our way ‘forward’?
Then this “Why America Needs a New Way of War” paper came to my attention: Why America Needs a New Way of War | Center for a New American Security. A fascinating read? Drawing potential parallels between the cult and liberal Quakerism, given its current practice and condition, could a reasoned appeal get the latter to, and as a matter of integrity, corporately renounce any authentic claim to SPICES? Isn’t the “Way of War” to which Quakers ostensibly object (as a loyal opposition?) now, two generations of war-making passé?
Or is it less a matter of not forgetting, and more a matter of transformatively seeing beyond a piety born of motivated reasoning in the first place?
sNAILmALEnotHAIL …but pace’n myself
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCeDkezgoyyZAlN7nW1tlfeA
life is for learning so all my failures must mean that I’m wicked smart
>
I see the link got lost in translation, so, https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/CNAS+Report+-+ANAWOW+-+FINAL.pdf.
Reading and considering John’s comment, a query: Did Woolman practice an integrity regarding human slavery that cannot be replicated within the systemic debt-slavery of debt-based fiat currencies and fractional reserve banking?
Thank you for this, Steve. That an inward attitude of belligerence begets, provokes and escalates violence has long been known; that violence justifies itself through scapegoating, which involves projection of the Jungian “shadow,” is more recent knowledge (see _A Course in Miracles_ for a thorough exploration of how pervasive this is); more recent still is the Mimetic Theory pioneered by René Girard (1923-2015) and woven into a pacifist Christian theology by Michael Hardin, whose _The Jesus Driven Life_ (2010) and _What the Facebook? Posts from the Edge of Christendom_ (2014) deserve prayerful study, I think, by every Quaker and every Christian concerned to help the human race arrest its collective addiction to violence.
Even when restraints on that addiction are currently keeping wars contained within “out of the way” places like Afghanistan, Palestine, and Yemen (which may be “out of the way,” perhaps, if you don’t have to live there), the human race is also involved now in a total war against nature, will we-nill we, and in danger of cooking life out of the planet.
One of Girard’s last books, _Achever Clausewitz_ (2007), published in English as _Battling to the End_ (2010), plausibly explains how _mimetic rivalry_ tends to keep our irrational destructive processes self-intensifying to the point of horrific apocalypse. And yet the answer to the escalating madness is as simple, Girard and Hardin agree, as the nonviolent Gospel of Jesus Christ, rightly understood, which can be adopted by each one of us as early as the present moment.