Vocal Ministry: A Garden, a School of the Spirit

October 6, 2025 § 1 Comment

Vocal ministry is the signature form of ministry in the Quaker way. As such, it is the classroom and laboratory in the school of the Spirit for Quaker ministry of all kinds. In our practice of vocal ministry, we can learn and experiment with all of the spiritual elements that make up the faith and practice of Quaker ministry more generally.

Listening for the Voice. The spiritual foundation of ministry is listening for the Voice that is calling us into service, an expectant attention to a possible anointing by the Spirit within us for service. Something there is within us that can hear that call, that can see that light, that can feel that prompt as a seed sprouting, pushing aside the soil of our soul and unfurling into the light of consciousness.

Nurturing the plant. Once you feel that baptism, then the attention changes into a form of waiting to see how the plant grows, combined with however we water such emerging shoots with deep contemplation. We nurture it, give it the fertilizer of this new kind of attention, until it matures and perhaps a flower blooms, a message, or a mission, that is taking more definite form.

Expectant waiting. Once the shoot, now a plant, has produced a blossom, a possible message, attention shifts again. We remain attentive and open, trying to hold onto the opening but not obstructing its development. Will we see it pollenated? Will new thoughts and feelings enter our regard and enrich it, so that some fruit begins to form? Or will the ministry of others bring some truth to the body ahead of our own that settles us back into silence? Or perhaps just the mystery of the deep silence itself will bring the fruit to maturity. If so, eventually a beam of Light shines upon it with clarity, a wind of the Spirit shakes the branch, and it falls ripe into your hand.

Discerning the Spirit. But we are not done yet. Another form of attention is required. Has it truly been pollenated by God? Is this fruit the fruit of the Spirit or of ego, or of a mind engaged but without a true spiritual transmission? Is it just for my own nourishment, or has it been given to me to serve to the meeting? If so, then, we become clear and out to the diners at the messianic banquet it goes.

Serving faithfully. Now, more deep listening even while speaking is required. If it has been given for the meeting, do I keep my ego off the plate in its delivery? Is my ministry truly service and savory in itself, or have I over-seasoned it? And do I know when the plate has been cleared, and I can sit down, having fulfilled my service?

Eldering. Once I’ve sat down, how do I feel—deeply at peace or quite energized, not in the satisfaction of self, but in some transcending sense of relief or of satisfaction? How does my Guide, the spirit of the christ, of the anointing, feel about my service? This inner reflection is just as subtle and delicate as all the other forms of spiritual attention we’ve exercised, just as reliant on experiment and practice. But we are not alone. What does the meeting think of my service? Is our meeting paying attention, deeply listening not just to the message but also to the Seed from which it grew? Is our meeting passing on the faith and tools for listening spirituality and ways to enter the depths of our being and listen? Is the meeting looking for opportunities to nurture those who are being called into service?

All of these forms of attention are versions of our listening spirituality, ways to attune ourselves to the movement of the Spirit within us and among us, to hear its message for us, as individuals and as meetings. Do we have teachers in this classroom? Have we given our ministers the tools they need to find their own faith and practices, so that they may grow in their service? And is the soil of our meeting’s garden fertile and ready to receive the new seeds that our ministry brings to us?

Meetings and Ministry, Part 5: Transferring Travel Minutes and Ministry Support Groups

August 7, 2025 § 1 Comment

As I said in a previous post, I have a minute of travel for the fostering of the gathered meeting among Friends, originally adopted by Central Philadelphia Meeting (CPM), and a spiritual support group that is nominally under the care of CPM’s Gifts and Leadings Committee. When I transferred my membership to Princeton Meeting in New Jersey, it wasn’t clear to anybody what to do with the minute or the support group. Philadelphia Yearly Meeting’s Faith and Practice offers no help, so the two meetings have had to work it out on their own. Having just been through that process, I have some ideas about how to handle the transfer of minutes of travel and service and of care for the minister.

Review of discernment. Before writing a letter of transfer, I feel that the transferring member’s meeting should consider whether the Friend they are writing the letter for is still under the leading that originally led to the minute and whether she or he has been faithful in its service. If so, the meeting should recommend in its letter of transfer that the new meeting conduct some kind of discernment itself regarding the minute and any spiritual support group that the transferring member’s meeting has convened. 

The minute. Regarding the minute, the new meeting could do one of three things: 

  • adopt the minute as it is on the recommendation of the transferring meeting; 
  • invite the new member to meet with worship and ministry or some committee to determine next steps; or 
  • convene its own clearness committee for discernment of a leading, along the lines laid out in Patricia Loring’s Pendle Hill Pamphlet Spiritual Discernment, #305.

In my case, we followed the second option, which worked fine. I met with Princeton Meeting’s Care and Concerns Committee (its pastoral care committee), and they crafted a revised version of the minute and recommended it to the meeting, which then approved it. This process was simple and it worked well.

The spiritual support group. Regarding any spiritual support group or anchor committee that may have been formed by the transferring meeting to support the minister and her or his ministry, the new meeting’s actions would depend on circumstances. The basic principle should be this, though: that the support committee should at least have members from the minister’s new worshipping community and it should probably be under the new meeting’s care.

In my situation, because the members of my committee are from different meetings and regions and even continents, and because all of the members of my current support committee want to remain on the committee, and because we meet on Zoom, my current committee is staying in place. So we have asked Princeton Meeting to name at least two new members to the committee, so that my support and my support committee will have a direct relationship with my worshipping community. We have yet to work out whether Princeton Meeting will formally take the committee under its care, but as I said, I think that that would be rightly ordered.

However, if the support committee has been meeting in person, and/or some of its members don’t want to continue serving, then the new meeting and any committee members that do want to continue serving will have to decide whether to start meeting virtually. Or, if the new meeting feels that in-person meeting is important, it might want to convene its own all new committee. Ultimately, care of the ministry is now up to the new meeting.

Meetings and Ministry, Part 4: Reviewing Faith and Practice

August 7, 2025 § Leave a comment

Yearly meetings should review their books of Faith and Practice to ensure that they treat minutes of travel and service fully, including what to do with such minutes when a member transfers membership. The recommendations below are based on Philadelphia Yearly Meeting’s entry on minutes of travel and service, which is rather brief but it covers the essentials pretty well.

The F&P entry on minutes of travel should:

  • Process. Lay out the process for clearness regarding the leading—to whom a Friend with a leading should go and what the clearness for discerning a leading should be. Lay out the process for writing the minute, and for its approval.
  • Minute’s content. Provide guidelines for the content of the minute—nature, scope, and duration of the proposed service, affirmation of the meeting’s support, room for endorsements.
  • Support. Consider forming a spiritual support committee of some kind for the minister while pursuing their ministry.
  • Release. Recommend that the meeting consider ways to help release the minister from obstacles to their service, if there are any.
  • Companionship. Recommend traveling with an elder or companion, if possible.
  • Meeting endorsement. Recommend endorsement by the regional meeting and the yearly meeting if the travel will extend beyond the region or the yearly meeting.
  • Visitation endorsement. Recommend asking that the bodies being visited endorse the minute, on its back or on an attached page, giving the name of the body visited, its location, and the date of service, comments on the character and quality of the service, and a signature and date of signature by the person(s) presiding in the visited body.
  • Reporting. Provide guidelines for reporting back to the meeting, perhaps annually.
  • Laying down. Provide guidelines for discernment and the laying down of the minute with final reporting when the minister and the meeting are clear that the minister has been released from their leading by the Holy Spirit.
  • Transfer of membership. Provide guidelines for both the transferring meeting and a member’s new meeting regarding the transfer of the minute and of care for any spiritual support that the transferring meeting may have convened for the minister.

Quaker Ministry Since the Cessation of Recording

January 1, 2023 § 13 Comments

I’m not sure how I came across this article, but its subject is right up my alley: “Our Quaker Ministry Since the Cessation of Recording,” by T. Edward Harvey, published in the British Friends Quarterly Examiner. It is apparently the transcript of an address to the Elders of London Yearly Meeting on May 22, 1946.

The author expresses a concern that is a recurring theme in this blog and my other writing: the collapse of meaningful, proactive eldering of vocal ministry after laying down the practice of recording ministers, or, as I prefer the usage that New York Yearly Meeting uses, recording gifts in ministry. Because its about the gifts and the ministry, not primarily the minister.

Anyway, here’s the section that spoke to me the most (page 188):

When Yearly Meeting made its decision to cease recording it was careful to say that recording was a matter of machinery, and that whether recording was discontinued or not, much more responsibility for the exercise of the ministry should be taken by the Monthly Meeting. Its recommendations are contained in Part III of our Book of Discipline, but unfortunately the great majority of our members do not read this—even Clerks of Monthly Meetings are sometimes lacking in knowledge of a good deal of it, and I would venture to say that there are a good many Elders who are not familiar with many of the passages in it dealing with the work which especially concerns them. [London Yearly Meeting apparently still had elders at this time.] There are in it extracts from the decisions of Yearly Meeting in 1924 which lay on our Meetings a definite duty with regard to the Ministry—and this duty we shall, I believe, have to admit has very largely not been carried out, though we may thankfully hope that the recommendation with regard to “a greater exercise of sympathetic eldership in our meeting, encouraging those who are beginning to speak” has been fulfilled in large measure. The section on Ministry continues thus:—

“The definite duty should be laid upon all Monthly Meetings of finding ways to show their interest in the Ministry and their sympathy with those called to this service. Though this is already the task of the Elders, it should also be shared by the meeting as a whole.

“It is not necessary that Monthly Meetings should adopt uniform methods of procedure in this respect, but in all cases they should be asked to find time for the consideration of questions affecting the Ministry and to endeavour in practical ways to express their fellowship with those who are called to undertake this service.”

How far has this been carried out? Do our Monthly Meetings regularly make it a part of their duty?

This was written twenty-two years after the yearly meeting laid down the practice of recording. Seventy-six years have passed since Friend Harvey addressed those elders, literally my entire lifetime. I think the situation is still the same here in America, at least.

Except for one all-important thing: In 1946, there were apparently still Friends who felt called to vocal ministry, though their meetings had fallen behind and were no longer ministering to their needs. How many Friends (who aren’t pastors in pastoral meetings) feel a calling to vocal ministry today? And how many meetings would recognize such a calling if it occurred or know what to do with such a person if they did?

On Eldering—A new book

December 31, 2022 § 2 Comments

I have just finished reading An Invitation to Quaker Eldering: On Being Faithful to the Ministry of Spiritual Nurture among Friends, by Elaine Emily and Mary Kay Glazer, with Janet Gibian Hough and Bruce Neumann.  I highly recommend this new and valuable contribution to an important subject.

This book has many strengths:

  • Inviting. The book is, in fact, very inviting. It uses diverse and mostly accessible language and is deliberately inclusive in its approach, not from a concern for political correctness, but because it includes so many voices, and not just those of the several authors.
  • Yet traditional. While the language is usually quite accessible, it also uses our traditional language about eldering. The combination of modern and traditional language and approach encourages both understanding and a grounding in our tradition. The word “eldering” itself is a trigger word for some Friends and I was very glad to see a deft intention to bring such Friends along and into the stream of our tradition.
  • Personal experience. It is full of sidebars with the heading Reflections on Eldering that are direct quotes from lots of Friends about various aspects of eldering. 
  • Comprehensive. It is thorough and comprehensive. It covers eldering from a lot of different angles, though it is missing some aspects, as I discuss below. It includes “Interludes” by a variety of Friends who speak concisely on a specific subject, like Physical Experiences of Eldering, or Eldering as Decolonizing Action.

So, while I am very grateful for this book, I did wish that it addressed some things it didn’t and that it gave a bit more emphasis to others:

History. 

I would have loved a chapter on the history of eldering. In particular, I would have liked a review of how the practice began among us, the development of the practice in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and the reasons for laying the recording of elders down in the twentieth.

The Bible. 

It might have been too much to take on in such a work, but a chapter on biblical sources for the practice of eldering in the early church and the use early Friends made of this guidance would have been a nice bonus.

Emphasis on holding rather than raising up. 

One of the appendices reports on a consultation on eldering held in 2013. Part of this appendix is the answers participants gave to a query: “The primary work of the elder is:” Of the forty answers, only five mentioned “To love and to name and nurture gifts of the Spirit in others,” as one respondent put it. Seventeen answered with a version of: “To hold the meeting in prayer.”  Eight answered with “love” in some form. 

These results reflect my own experience with the elders with whom I am familiar—holding the meeting in love and prayer, and a deep sensitivity to and emphatic interest in, the “metaphysical” dynamics of the meeting for worship, coupled with the ministry of spiritual companionship for ministers who are traveling or serving in some way, these are a priority. And these are really important. Well, the strong interest in how Spirit is moving in the meeting at the transcendental level is truly intriguing, and the Friends I know who love to do this have a very sophisticated vocabulary for discussing it. 

However, I personally feel that the most important function of elders is not the transcendental, or psycho-spiritual “holding” of the body, but the practical work of nurturing spiritual gifts in the members, recognizing their leadings and giving them the discernment and support they need. 

This, for me, is a matter of emphasis, not either/or. The holding is valuable, and as some of the first-hand accounts in the book testify, it is real. That is, sometimes some people can feel the difference, the grounding and deepening of the worship through such prayer, invisible though it is. But I think this more arcane aspect of eldering gets too much attention, relative to more important aspects.

Building a culture of eldership. 

There’s a chapter on Envisioning a Quaker Culture of Eldering, but it felt a bit weak to me. This is arguably the most important chapter of the book—how do we nurture greater spiritual maturity in our meetings for this work? The first sentence of the chapter says it all: “Elders and the ministry of eldering are foundational to the practice of Quakerism.” Yes!

Most of the chapter is comprised of descriptions of the growth of such a culture in New York Yearly Meeting, Australia Yearly Meeting, and Pacific Yearly Meeting, and these accounts are terrific and very useful. A lot of the rest of the chapter is first-hand Reflections on Eldering. But most of the rest of the chapter is a listing of “certain characteristics of communities where a culture of eldering is growing.” These are:

  • Eldering is recognized as important.
  • Communities are intentional about creating and sustaining such a culture.
  • Elders practice communal and individual spiritual disciplines.
  • Meeting leadership is involved.
  • The community shares a “familiarity with and capacity for spiritual wilderness,” and a “fluency in wilderness spirituality,” by which they mean helping Friends and meetings who find themselves in wild places, uncharted, turbulent, and even dangerous situations.

But there is little attention to the practical problems and efforts required to nurture such a culture in our meetings. The only ideas for how to do this are:

  • Elders forming a community of elders.
  • Elders sharing news about the community’s eldering needs, while balancing the need for confidentiality against our tendency to a dysfunctional culture of silence.

Regarding these characteristics listed above: How do you teach a meeting that eldering is important? How do you generate collective intentionality in a community that might not even know what you’re talking about or in which there is some resistance? How do you engage meeting leadership in the project? And how do you prepare a meeting for conflict and hard times?

I realize that there are no easy answers to these questions. But the authors have a great deal of experience, and I suspect that they could have reached deeper and given us more practical advice on what they themselves recognize is one of their essential roles.

Vocal ministry. 

Almost completely missing from this book is the role of elder in the nurture of the meeting’s vocal ministry. This astounds me. 

For hundreds of years, care of the vocal ministry was the essence of the Quaker elder’s calling. It’s one of the great innovations of the modern period that we’ve expanded the understanding of ministry to include lots of service besides the vocal ministry, and thus we’ve expanded the role of the elder, and this book overs this role very well. But, for the vast majority of our membership, at least in the silent worship meetings, “eldering” means criticizing somebody’s ministry. Meanwhile, we do almost nothing to proactively nurture our vocal ministry or provide support and oversight for our ministers. We have a lot of work to do here.

We often don’t even think of those who speak in meeting as ministers, certainly not as Friends with a calling to vocal ministry—they don’t see their speaking this way, and neither do their meetings. THIS is the great calling to eldership that our times desperately need—a new, creative, proactive approach to fostering Spirit-led vocal ministry and the nurture of a culture of eldership in our meetings that understands how important Spirit-led vocal ministry is and the role that elders should be playing in its nurture. For, as a Friend who carries a ministry of service for love, peace, and nonviolence in north Philly once told me, all ministry, including this “activist” ministry, includes vocal ministry at its core; her ministry is about what she does, but also about what she says.

Nevertheless, this book is a tremendous resource, and I am grateful for it. I encourage my readers to check it out. Please don’t let the length of my more critical comments overrun my genuine and enthusiastic praise for this book.

Eldering Troublesome Ministry

November 9, 2022 § 1 Comment

In this post, I share some thoughts about how to “elder” someone whose ministry has been the cause of someone else leaving the worship or even leaving the meeting. I should add that I have not done the things I suggest below or actually asked the questions I propose. These ideas have come from years—decades—of thinking about the problem and serving on worship and ministry committees facing the problem. I am keen to know what my readers think, so your comments are welcome.

When someone stops coming to worship or even leaves the meeting because they can’t stand someone else’s regular vocal ministry, it’s time to reach out to the person who left with some pastoral care, and it’s time to engage with the vocal minister. The pastoral care should include the promise that the meeting will engage with the minister, or that you already have. So that engagement really needs to happen.

The worship and ministry committee needs to answer some questions for itself first:

  1. How many other people are unhappy with this regular ministry? Has anybody else left the worship over the same issue? Are any members of the committee unhappy?
  2. Why are people unhappy? Is it the content of the messages, the tone of delivery, the frequency of the speaking, or something else, or some combination of these? Alternatively, is it possible that the problem really lies with the person who left?
  3. Gifts for ministry, or not? Does anyone think that the minister does have some gifts and even perhaps a genuine calling to vocal ministry, given that they speak frequently enough to bother some people, and the minister could just use some constructive eldership? (This has been my judgment in a couple of the cases that I’ve experienced.) 

The answer to the first question will calibrate how urgent the problem is and guide how intent the committee should be in working toward an outcome.

The answer to the second and third questions will guide the manner of the intervention.

So—how do you approach a troublesome ministry in as tender and constructive a way as possible? 

Note that I feel we are dealing with a ministry, not the minister. Keeping this in mind will, I hope, help a little to keep the minister from feeling attacked or criticized. But it’s actually what we’re about, anyway. I am asking that we start from a foundation of assuming the Spirit is at work here somehow, or could be, if we focus on that rather than on the person and their behavior. 

So—I would start with some questions:

  1. We notice that you speak quite often in meeting for worship. Do you feel a general calling to speak that goes beyond the prompting to speak at the moment in any given meeting for worship?
    1. If they do feel they have a calling:
      1. Is there any way we can support you in your calling? Do you feel that the meeting should have a role in supporting your ministry in your calling? What do you want our role to be?
      2. How does your calling relate to or spring from the rest of your spiritual life? What is the rest of your spiritual life? Is there any way we can enrich your foundation in the life of the spirit?
      3. How much do you know about the Quaker traditions regarding vocal ministry? Have you read any pamphlets or gone to any workshops or RE programs on vocal ministry? Would you like us to recommend some?
      4. Regarding the three areas of possible contention with their ministry:
        1. Content. So what is it about your message, the themes you keep returning to in your ministry, that draws you? Where do these ideas come from in your past experience? Why do you feel that the meeting needs to keep hearing these ideas?
        2. Tone. What are you feeling when you feel the need to speak? Are you aware that some of us feel uncomfortable with the energy you project when you speak? That’s not your goal, is it?
        3. Frequency. What tests do you use to discern whether you should speak? What factors influence you to speak so often?
    2. If the answer about a calling is no, I don’t feel a calling, or I don’t know, I never thought about it, then:
      1. If the committee thinks that it’s possible that this minister does have a calling, but just needs some help with discernment and guidance:
        1. Well, since you speak fairly often, we think you might have such a calling. Would you like to explore that possibility with us? 
        2. If the answer is no, I don’t want to explore it with you, then ask, Why not?
      2. If the committee doubts that there is a true calling, still, something is going on to lead this person to speak frequently and in the way that they do. So then:
        1. Well, you speak quite frequently in meeting, so why? What is it that does lead you to speak? It seems like something is going on to create this regular pattern besides just a prompting in the moment. We would like to understand your process better.
        2. The committee will probably have to keep asking Spirit-led questions to probe this last aspect of the situation to its source, or to some depth that might lead to an opening. The opening is the goal. And we are aiming with our queries for the same spirit that guides our questions when holding a clearness committee— prayer, deep listening, humble submission to one’s own inner Guide.

At this point, or maybe earlier—somewhere in this conversation—one might think about asking the minister whether they are aware that people have left the meeting for worship because of their ministry. 

The minister is likely to want to know who the people are who left and why. I would not tell them. This is not about the persons; it is about the ministry. And the question of why people might be upset should be asked and answered within the minister, where it could lead to some opening, rather than by the committee, where it’s likely to lead to defensiveness.

Whether or not the minister is aware that people are that upset with their ministry, once you tell them the committee might explore with the minister:

  • How that makes them feel.
  • What about their ministry they think might be the issue (again—not what the committee thinks or what the person(s) who have left think is the issue).
  • Whether it makes them open to some eldership, or makes them willing to consider reexamining their ministry in some other way.

And, somewhere in the conversation, I would add something like this: 

  • Naturally, we are hoping that the person who left will feel safe in coming back at some point, and at the same time we are hoping that we can support your ministry in a way that is Spirit-led on our part and that deepens and enriches your service to the meeting and to the Spirit.
  • For we know that the Holy Spirit is trying to work through you for all our spiritual benefit, and we suspect that you want that, too. So our goal is not to accuse you or correct you, but to find out where the source of your ministry lies and how we might support you as a channel for its manifestation.

Meanwhile, this whole thing is fraught with risk and could go south. At some point in the conversation, the minister might become defensive, feel hurt, and lash out or withdraw, even if you have acted with true tenderness and clarity of mission. And of course, it would not be hard for the committee itself to misstep somehow. And now you have added another hurt person to however many people are upset with this ministry. We are all only human.

This is why so many of our worship and ministry committees fail to act in situations like this. First, you have to come to a clear sense of the committee that such an intervention is necessary and about who should do it and how. Every committee I have knowledge of has struggled to get this kind of clarity and unity. But even when you arrive at some clarity and unity, whatever the committee might do can still make things worse.

Against this risk, we have to weigh the responsibility to protect the meeting for worship and the meeting’s fellowship, on the one hand, and to nurture Spirit-led vocal ministry on the other. My principle is this: As soon as one person has left meeting because of someone else’s behavior, then you might as well have lost the person whose behavior drove them out (assuming that the person who left has good reason). If you lose the frequent, troublesome minister because they feel offended by your outreach, or they stop speaking in meeting, you might get back the person who left—if you’ve acted soon enough. And you would have improved the quality of the worship.

Or the minister might stay, might keep speaking frequently and/or speak in ways that put people off. They might even starting acting out. More people might leave, or at least complain.

That calls for a level of pastoral intervention that lies beyond the scope of this post, which is already very long. And for which I have fewer ideas and less confidence. But I’m going to explore it anyway in a future post. Because we need to work on this.

Evil, the Collective, and the New Lamb’s War

May 15, 2022 § 3 Comments

Evil becomes fully transcendental when it manifests as sin by the collective. It is in the psycho-social dynamics of the mob that evil becomes a spirit, a Power, a force that transcends the personal to animate individuals into acting as organs of the collective. In its transcendental state, evil is capable of attracting and infecting new members to the collective, sometimes just on contact, and of transforming even those who otherwise would resist evil into at least silent enablers. 

This spirit’s weapons are fear, which leads to hate, and the lie. Hence what I call ideological evil, the willingness to do evil in the name of what you believe—burning witches, mass murder of Jews, invading Iraq or Ukraine, storming the Capitol.

That’s the psycho-social face of collective evil. There’s also a structural and systemic face—slavery and Jim Crow and the new Jim Crow, wage slavery and the other oppressive structures of capitalism, personal and collective dependence on fossil fuels, campaign finance law and partisan gerrymandering.

How do you turn the mob around? How do you transform the dominion of a system? The traditional Quaker answer is the Lamb’s War, individual and collective witness to the Truth through the word/Word, through the good news of a viable alternative exercised in the hands of love.

But you need an alternative. Where there is no vision, the people perish (Proverbs 19:18); or, as my NRSV puts it, where there is no prophecy, the people cast off restraint.

Thus, the Quaker answer today, I believe, begins with the nurture of prophecy. It begins with efforts by meetings to foster mature spirituality in its members and in its collective worship, expecting that God will raise up servants in good time; to recognize and support the prophets that the Spirit raises up among us; and to surrender our own attachments to ideas and structures in favor of true revelation.

We have to go deeper than the facile turn to the ideas of “that of God in everyone” and of the “testimonies” as ready and settled outward guides for action. A sublime idea about human nature (“that of God in everyone”) or minutes of conscience unpacking the SPICES will not save us. Only the Holy Spirit can do that.

Presumably, the Holy Spirit is trying. Are we?

If Spirit-led prophecy is the vehicle for Quaker contributions to the struggle against collective evil, then every Quaker meeting should be proactively preparing the soil, teaching its members the Quaker traditions around Spirit-led openings, leadings, and ministry. Every meeting should be equipped to provide Friends who feel they may have divine leadings with discernment (clearness committees for discernment) and to provide support for those whom God has in fact called. 

This means meaningful religious education programs on Quaker ministry and an active and Spirit-led worship and ministry committee proactively building up the spiritual maturity of the meeting and its members. The obvious place to start with the nurture of Spirit-led ministry is with vocal ministry. 

Vocal ministry is the signature form of ministry in our tradition. It is the laboratory in which emerging ministers find their feet and in which the meeting learns to listen, discern, and support. And it sometimes is the launching pad for a Friend’s leading, the moment when they first hear the call. And in this regard, we should expand our view of vocal ministry to include programs outside the meeting for worship and any other speech addressed to the meeting. My own path into Quaker ministry came while I was preparing for an earthcare program for a meeting.

Finally, I believe we need to become much more open to what Friends in the elder days called public ministry: speaking Truth to the Powers where they are in their positions of power. I believe this means going beyond the writing of minutes of conscience and publishing them or sending them as letters to the powerful; it means sending people to speak in person.

But of course we can only send those who have been called. Do our members know to listen for the call? Are our meetings prepared to help them discern their call and give them the support they need, no matter what their calling?

Presumably, the Holy Spirit is doing its part. Are we?

Supporting Quaker Ministry—Thoughts & Queries

March 2, 2020 § 1 Comment

One of the fundamentals of Quaker spirituality is the faith and practice of Quaker ministry—watching, waiting, listening for when we may be called into some service on God’s behalf, and answering that call with faithfulness. One of the most important roles of the Quaker meeting is to nurture this faith and practice in our members, to help members who have some prompting of the spirit with discernment—is this a true leading or not?—and to support the minister when we are clear that they have in fact been called.

Every ministry faces obstacles. Every minister has moments of doubt, confusion, worry, and/or frustration in the face of outward obstacles and inward vagaries. So it’s really important that a meeting have a faithful culture of eldership, embodied in corporate systems of discernment and support, in the hands of earnest and caring Friends. The benefits are many:

  • Supports the ministry. Structures and processes in the meeting for the eldership of ministry answer that of God in the minister, they protect and further the work, and they serve the motion of love in the world which the minister serves. They serve the the work of the Spirit in the world.
  • Supports the life of the meeting. These structures and processes integrate the minister and the ministry into the life of the meeting, bring the meeting into the work, and deepen the spiritual life of the meeting as a whole.
  • Supports the elders. These structures and processes also deeply enrich the spiritual lives of those who care for the minister and her or his work. I have served on a couple of support groups for Friends who carry a ministry, and I want to testify to how important and rewarding this service is. I’m serving on one now, and literally every time our little group meets, we feel the Spirit moving within us and among us in love; it’s been one gathered meeting after another.

The spiritual nurture of Quaker ministry is a profound blessing all the way around.

Queries

So, some queries:

  • What do you and your meeting do to share the faith, practice, and history of Quaker ministry, so that members really understand this aspect of Quaker spirituality, know how to approach the meeting when they feel they might have a leading or ministry, and feel confident that they will receive the support they need?
    • Do you sponsor religious education programs on Quaker ministry, for both adults and children?
    • Do you have members who know this tradition well enough to teach it or who are willing to study it and then teach it when they feel ready?
    • Do you have members who are following some leading or carrying some ministry already, who could share their experience with the rest of the meeting and/or who might need your support?
  • Does your meeting have a committee that is prepared to provide corporate discernment and to support of leadings and ministries, with Friends experienced in this kind of eldership, or Friends eager to learn by studying and doing? This need not be a dedicated committee with this charge only, but if it is your ministry and worship committee, or some other committee with a broader charge, is the eldership of ministry on its agenda and receiving proper attention?
  • Do you have readily available resources that can guide these elders and inform your ministers in the faith and practice of Quaker ministry?
    • Does your meeting library have some essential materials on Quaker ministry?
    • Has your worship and ministry committee gathered the many resources available online into your institutional memory somehow, especially if you don’t have a meeting library or it’s not complete?

In my next post, I plan to offer these kinds of resources to make this part of the meeting’s job easier.

Where Am I?

You are currently browsing the eldership category at Through the Flaming Sword.